CONTENTS
- 1 HEBREW ISRAELITE ERRORS
- 2
- 3 WE WERE NOT CALLED TO A RELIGION, DENOMINATION OR CAMP
- 4 NO HEBREW ISRAELITE IN THE BIBLE
- 5 WE WERE CALLED TO FOLLOW THE WAY
- 6 THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY
- 7 5 MAJOR HEBREW ISRAELITE ERRORS
- 8 Following The Wrong Way
- 9 Water Baptism
- 10 Are We In The New Covenant?
- 11 Calling The Father & Son Pagan Names
- 12 Using Pagan Symbols
- 13 Bonus: Why We 100% Must Be Baptized
HEBREW ISRAELITE ERRORS
Hebrew Israelite errors? What errors? The Hebrew Israelite movement has awaken many Israelites as to who they are. It has also brought much scriptural truth, bringing out the word that was written for the nation of Israel.
So what errors are we talking about? Let’s see.
Note that this post about Hebrew Israelite errors is not us bashing the Hebrew Israelites, but rather providing correction for the errors from a movement that is missing many (important) things. As a result of these few things, they are way off track and many are being misled by them.
The two teachings below are recommended to anyone who wants to know the way of truth by understanding the errors of the Hebrew Israelites. These are detailed teachings that show the false doctrines that most of them follow.
Importantly, we have to make very, very sure we are in line with all truth. One “simple” lie can throw us totally off.
That is why we here at Just a Word dedicate ourselves to prove all things and at the same time, not set up a religious denomination or a camp.
Here is why.
WE WERE NOT CALLED TO A RELIGION, DENOMINATION OR CAMP
The Most High did not call us to any religion or denomination. He called us to ONE BODY, which includes Israelites and non-Israelite gentiles.
Eph 4:4 There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
Religion is the tradition of man. Denominations are the products of modern churchianity, and the children of Yasharal were not in camps until they were gathered out of Egypt. All of these therefore, are not for our people.
NO HEBREW ISRAELITE IN THE BIBLE
Additionally, there is no Hebrew Israelite in the Bible. The children of Israel were either called Hebrews or Israelites. I am a Hebrew, and I am an Israelite, but I am not a Hebrew Israelite, as this is a new label.
Sounds insignificant, doesn’t it? But here is why it is significant.
The name has become synonymous with teachings that are not in the Bible. For example: “baptism is the word, and not water.”
Through these Hebrew Israelite errors they have added to and subtracted from the word.
All this as some sets strive for power in camps that rival each other, debating with each other, having sometimes the same and other times different doctrines and teachings among them.
WE WERE CALLED TO FOLLOW THE WAY
However, we must realize that there is only one faith in the scripture, and that is “the way.”
Act 24:14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the Aluah of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:
“The way” is not about a new religion in the end time, but a gathering of the house of Israel, the house of Judah, along with Gentiles (non-Israelites). Many camps of course, reject Gentiles, going against the word.
Isa 49:6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.
THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY
The Most High is not the author (causer) of confusion in our assemblies, and in accepting that there is one body (Ephesians 4:4), it must mean there is only one way. Jude calls it the faith ONCE DELIVERED unto the saints:
Jud 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
Read the bible: the Hebrew Israelite doctrine was not the faith once delivered to the saints. There is nowhere in the new testament where it tells us we are called to only wake up our people. That was before salvation was revealed to the Gentiles. That is yet another of the several Hebrew Israelite errors.
On the contrary, we are called to preach to all. That is what the Apostles did. However, clever twisting of the word has made Hebrew Israelites convince themselves that their unforgiveness and refusal to preach the good news to all people is righteous.
Heb 5:9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
Salvation is to be preached to all. Let the Most High reject who he will: who are we to be sorting out people and determining who should hear the good news. Was that what The Apostles did in the end (when the full truth was revealed to them)?
5 MAJOR HEBREW ISRAELITE ERRORS
Therefore, this post will highlight 5 of the Hebrew Israelite errors in some (not all) of the Hebrew Israelite movements. We emphasize “not all,” because there are some who call themselves Hebrew Israelites and follow the way in some shape or form. Hence some of these may or may not pertain to all.
Also bear in mind that these are just some of the errors we looked into. There are several more.
Again, this is not bashing our brothers, but rather correction as we help each other along the way to salvation. Please watch the videos.
My dear friends,
Yahusha (aka our Lord Jesus Christ) is NOT a “Jew” He is a Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah.
The word “Jew” and its modern meaning did not even come into existence until the 17th Century when the letter “J” was first invented. And at the time the word “Jew” was first put into the Bible (in the 2nd draft copy of the KJV Bible in the 18th Century…. the 1st edition of the KJV Bible in 1611 used the word IEWE to describe Judahite Hebrews – not “Jews”) it was to be understood in one context only – the word “Jew” was an abbreviation for Judean.
A person living in the region of ANCIENT Israel known as Judea (NOT in today’s so called “Israel”) was known and called a “Judean” without regard to their actual race or religion….
REPEAT….
WITHOUT REGARD TO their RACE OR RELIGION.
It is exactly like a person who is born in Texas is a Texan. Is a “Texan” a race of people?
No. A “Texan” is someone who is born in Texas and has nothing to do with their RACE or RELIGION.
Question:
What race are Christians?
What race are Muslims?
(Sorry – the answer is “NO” if you said Arabs (a true Semitic people). Many Arabs are Muslim, but there are Muslims in every country and from every culture, just like Christians).
What race are Hindu’s or Buddhists?
What race are “Jews”?
The answer is the same for ALL of these groups. These terms don’t describe a race of people they describe a “Religion” that All kinds of different races of people practice from all over the world!
A resident of ancient Judea was called a Judean; so when the 2nd draft of the KJV Bible was introduced in the 1800’s a NEW WORD was ADDED to replace IEWE and that was the word “Jew” (an abbreviation for a “Judean” — a person living in ancient Judea — but Yahusha (aka: Jesus Christ) is NOT from Judea and NEVER WAS and therefore Yahusha (JESUS) IS NOT a “Jew” or a Judean!
Yahusha IS from Galilee so He IS a Galilean and was known as such and called as such throughout the New Testament!
So again, Yahusha was NEVER a “Jew” He was ALWAYS a Galilean!
During the time of Yahusha there were some people still part of the tribes of Israel but there were no longer 12 fully in tact tribes. By this time (the time of the coming of the Messiah – Yahusha) there were only 2 tribes left and the disciples of Yahusha were following the Law of Moses and the Prophets – NOT “Judaism”! Judaism came back from the Judahite Hebrew Rabbis who only 50 years earlier had returned from the Babylonian exile and brought back with them the Talmud and were now practicing a new interpretation of the Mosaic Law based on the Talmud (and the Kaballah) and not on the Law & Prophets.
This is why our Lord Yahusha condemned the entire Sanhedrin including the Pharisees and said they had replaced the Word of God (Yahuwah) “with the traditions of men” (The Talmud & Kaballah).
The Talmud is nothing more than COMMENTARY from Judahite Rabbis on their interpretation and opinion of the Torah and Mosaic Law & Prophets. And Yahusha said their father was the devil. So called “Jewish” people today are not a race of people my friend! If you say you are “Jewish” you are saying you practice a NON Abrahamic religion known as Judaism and Judaism today was known as Pharisaism in the New Testament times. Our Lord Yahusah/Yahushua (Jesus Christ) totally condemned the Pharisee & ENTIRE Sanhedrin and told them their Father was THE DEVIL. Wow.
If you say you are a “Jew” today…. you are also saying you’re 85-90% Ashkenazi Eastern European from one of several countries in Eastern Europe who have mostly Khazarian ancestors. So modern so called “Jewish” people have absolutely no connection whatsoever because they are not even remotely a Semitic people and HAVE NO CONNECTION AT ALL (through Ancestry or by religion) to Abraham and the 12 tribes of Hebrew Israelites. And modern so called Israel has absolutely no connection to ancient Biblical Israel. How DARE THEY even call it today “Israel”. It is an ABOMINATION.
Again 85-90% of ALL modern so called “Jewish” people are Ashkenazi Eastern Europeans – they are not even remotely a Semitic people. There is nothing wrong with being Ashkenazi in and of itself (I myself am supposedly Ashkenazi on both sides of my family) but there IS something VERY WRl.fONG with CLAIMING to be Hebrew Israelites and have a special covenant with the true and living God when you are not even remotely related to Hebrews Israelites. Furthermore ALL Hebrew Israelites were utterly destroyed in A.D. 70 by the Roman army and their temple taken down “stone by stone” just as our Lord Yahusha said it would! This was His most powerful prophecy that came to pass only 40 years after He proclaimed it! This was the gospel that was preached for at least 500 years after our Lord Yahusha rose from the dead and Victoriously conquered SIN and DEATH and the Devil – (i.e. Lucifer who had become Satan!). It is HE – our Lord Yahusha who overcame this Synagogue of Satan and identifies them in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 as “those who SAY they are “Jews” (actual original translation is “Judeans” or the tribe of “Judahite Hebrews” who rejected the Messiah) as being of the Synagogue of Satan. And THAT is who had these FAKE translations and confusing translations put into modern Bibles that has caused so much confusion and LIES to be perpetrated against the true body of Christ and the rest of the world! This TOTAL LIE that “Jewish” people are the ancestors of Abraham and the Hebrew Israelites is one the most egregious evil lies in the history of the world, and I have provided you 100% proof of this in my last 2 posts:
My dear friend… I agree with you 100% that the institutional so-called “church” is NOT a Biblical model for fellowship and is a work of men at its core. However, unlike you, I believe the Father is still working in this failed system because HE KNOWS THE DECEPTION GOING ON and HIS LOVE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE SEEKING HIM is why He still works within the broken so-called “church” system to bring those He has called and IS CALLING OUT OF IT; like me.
I am the founder and former singer, songwriter, and guitarist of the Christian rock band GUARDIAN known all over the world. I have been a follower of our Heavenly Father Yahuah and HIS GLORIOUS SON YAHUSHA (YAHUSHUA, YAHSHUA, YESHUA) for about 40 years now and have been a deep student of Holy Scripture the entire time.
The information below is only a fraction of my total research but what I do present, aligns with your teaching (to a certain extent) on the subject of the institutional church as NOT a Biblical model. I agree 100% based on the teaching of scripture and the model provided for us in the book of Acts and based on the word Ekklesia (Ecclesia) and its true meaning: Here is my research on this subject:
The word “Church” is NOT in the New Testament Non Translated writings! However, the word “Ekklesia” (also spelled: “Ecclesia”) IS in the Non-Translated NT and means something VERY MUCH DEEPER than the word “church”:
https://www.beinaberean.org/writings/church.html
http://www.aggressivechristianity.net/articles/ecclesia.htm
https://lewayotte.com/2009/11/24/words-not-found-in-scripture-church/
Modern Churches are “married to the state” thru 501-c3 tax status; this also is NOT Biblical for many reasons listed in these 2 links:
https://www.worldslastchance.com/end-time-prophecy/state-controlled-churches-the-501c3-deception.html
http://cantontruth.blogspot.com/2008/05/how-irs-controls-churches-through-501c3.html?m=1
The Church “Service” itself (how it is structured) is NOT Biblical:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/biblicisminstitute.wordpress
.com/2014/10/14/church-services-are-not-biblical/amp/
https://relearnchurch.org/4-biblical-elements-missing-from-the-modern-church-service/
http://www.inthebeginning.com/articles/church.htm
https://relevantmagazine.com/god/church/4-ways-modern-church-looks-nothing-early-church
https://www.truthaccordingtoscripture.com/documents/church-practice/house-churches.php#.W4LhRPllA0M
The name “JESUS” is a 400-year-old name (translated from the Greek means: “Hail Zeus”) and was INVENTED when the letter “J” (the last letter added to the English alphabet) was first introduced in the 17th century and included in the NT translations for the first time in the 18th century!
http://boatrvgroup.com/sabbathcovenant/christianitythegreatdeception/IesousinGreek.htm
(Note: Everything written below is from the link above… I felt it was so important I cut & paste the entire info from the link & put it below)
(Note: This is the ONLY INFORMATION from this site I use… the rest of the site I mostly disagree with… for instance the author believes there are “real Jewish people” and “counterfeit Jews” — this shows a serious misunderstanding of that entire subject. “Jews” and “Jewish people” are NOT A RACE OF PEOPLE. Period. The Askenaziam (Eastern Europeans), Sephardim & African “Jews” are all NON Semitic people and have absolutely NO CONNECTION genetically or through ancestry to the ancient Biblical Hebrews and the 12 tribes or to Abraham and his son Jacob. NONE. As in ZERO.
That said, the reason I use this info below is because it is taught by several other independent sources all saying the same thing. But this site has a much more thorough explanation.
Here is the info:
So Yahusha is English for the Hebrew name of the Messiah (anointed King of Israel) and Jesus is the name of the Greek “good man” or Chistos. It is that simple. But what does “Iesous” mean in Greek. It has no meaning in Hebrew; as it is not a Hebrew word. In Greek, “Iesous” literally translated means “Hail Zeus”. The name “Jesus” didn’t even exist until the 4th Century and was a later derivative of the late Latin Isus.
“It is known that the Greek name endings with sus, seus, and sous were attached by the Greeks to names and geographical areas as means to give honor to their supreme deity, Zeus.”
Dictionary of Christian Lore and Legend
“This name of the true Messiah, Jahshuwah (Jehoshua), being Hebrew, was objectionable to the Greeks and Romans, who hated the Judeans (Jews), and so it was deleted from the records, and a new name inserted. Jahshuwah (Jehoshua) was thus replaced by Ie-Sous (hail Zeus), now known to us as Jesus.”
-The Origin of Christianity
by A.B. Traina
“It is simply amazing to think that all these years, hundreds of years, mankind has been calling the Saviour by the wrong name!! It’s hard to give up the name of Jesus because it’s so deeply ingrained in us and much has been said and done in that name.”
-Gospel of The Kingdom
True Names and Title
Dr. Henry Clifford Kinley
1931 – Ohio USA
“In the 1611 KJ New Testament the name Yahusha appeared originally wherever the Messiah was spoken of. Yahusha means “Yahuah is Salvation”. Later the Messiah’s name was replaced with Iesus (Greek) which later in the 1600’s it became Jesus starting with the new English letter “J” which was introduced at that time. Further, the Greek “Iesus” comes from the name Zeus, the ruling God in the Greek pantheon.”
-Gospel of The Kingdom
True Names and Title
Dr. Henry Clifford Kinley
1931 – Ohio USA
We see in historical documents that the name “Jesus” did not even come into existence until the 1600’s when the letter “J” was introduced into our English language. So the name “Jesus” is only around 400 years old! The Greek “Iesus” comes from the name Zeus, the ruling God in the Greek pantheon. “Jesus” is a transliteration of a Latin name only ONE letter off “Ioesus” pronounced hey-sus – which has no meaning in Hebrew, but in Latin it means “Hail Zeus”. If Yahusha’s name had been transliterated into our language, it would have been Joshua. If the name was treated properly using the compound naming convention YHVH intended it would be YAH(weh)(ye)SHUA shortened to “Yahusha” using the short contracted form maintaining the meaning of the name and fulfilling prophecy that the Messiah “came in the NAME of YHVH”.
If the name was handled properly in Greek by the uninspired pagan scribes, it would hold true to the “meaning” of the name as given by the Angel to Joseph and Mary; then “shua” or salvation would have been translated “soterion or soter” not “sous”. So we see a gross mis-handling of the Messiah’s name at best but when you look back in history we see a Hyalinization of the name with the intent to give glory to the pagan god Zeus.
One simply would need to open up their Greek Lexicon to know the truth behind this; below is the entry from The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon:
Strong’s Number: 4992: soterion, adjective. Meaning saving, bringing salvation he who embodies this salvation, or through whom God is about to achieve it the hope of (future) salvation
The name in Latin of the Messiah therefore would have been something closer to Iesoter or Iesoterion if the intent of the meaning of the name was honored by the Greek and Roman pagan scribes and modern day translators. The name would never have been “Iesous” taking on the suffix of every other Greek name given to give glory to Zeus… “us”.
The reason behind this abomination is clearly seen. The name “Jesus” has the exact same suffix as the name of the Roman Emperor who created it: Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus. “Why” does every word in Constantine’s name end in “us”? It would only stand to reason that the all powerful Emperor would give a name to his new god in his own image with the suffix “us”. After all, Constantine believed himself to be re-incarnated Apollo (the son of Zeus). And he remade the Messiah in his own image then elevated that “image of the false messiah” in the name “Jesus” as god to be worshipped. This act of paganizing the messiah and worshipping an image of a man above YHVH is condemned by Paul in a letter to the church in Rome!
Romans 1
21 Because that, when they knew YHVH, they glorified YHVH not as God (elevating Jesus/Trinity in their hearts as God), neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened (to believe a pagan lie). 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal YHVH for images made to look like mortal man (the image of “Jesus”) and birds and animals and reptiles (signs of The Zodiac).
24 Therefore YHVH gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about YHVH for a lie (pagan Trinity), and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
When we simply take the first step and admit to ourselves the obvious, it becomes abundantly clear both “why” and “how” the name “Jesus” was easily accepted by a pagan population that worshiped Zeus, Hesus, Horus, Krishna, Julius Ceasar and the demi-god son Apollo the god of the sun. To the pagan Romans of their day, the name Iesous (Jesus Christ or JC) looked and sounded almost identical to their god-man Julius Ceasar or (JC). This is true today even in English (Julius / Jesus) even their initials remain the same an have nothing in common with Yahusha the Messiah. The English translation of Yahusha looks nothing and sounds nothing like “Jesus” it is “Joshua” or even truer still Yahusha.
The obvious truth is the Messiah’s name was changed and he was given a name like every other Greek in honor of Zeus. No wonder Yahusha condemns those who “in his name” did all that amazing stuff using the name “Jesus” teaching The Law has been abolished. They never knew him. They literally fell for the false religion of pagan Rome.
Next: Jesus in English – Earthly Pig
HOME
END OF THIS SITE’S INFO
OTHER SOURCES Saying the same or something very similar — that the name “Jesus” is NOT OUR SAVIOR’S Real name:
https://www.worldslastchance.com/why-yahuwah-a-yahushua-only.html
http://www.hiddenbible.com/jesuszeus/jesuszeus.html
http://www.eliyah.com/nameson.htm
Early Believers for the first 400-500 years COMPLETELY AGREED AGAINST WAR, KILLING and VIOLENCE of ANY KIND! Period. They DID NOT support being in the military at all! If you were in it BEFORE becoming a believer you HAD TO LEAVE IT in order to be a part of their fellowships!
https://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2016/janfeb/early-church-on-war-and-killing.html?paging=off
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2013/07/08/the-early-church-and-military-service/
http://themelios.thegospelcoalition.org/article/nonviolence-in-the-ancient-church-and-christian-obedience
http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/socgospel.htm
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/christiancrier/2018/05/30/how-did-the-early-church-differ-from-the-church-today/
I’ve included articles on the early believers’ views on the military and war as well because the so-called “church” (especially the evangelical “churches”) think being in the military is honorable and a “Christian duty” when in reality it’s the exact opposite.
But there are more issues to consider under the same pretext. That pretext being the fact that the English translations of the New Testament have had several WORD CHANGES or a better way to say is… there has been some “tinkering” with just a few select words and these words have caused GREAT CONFUSION and GREAT DECEPTION within the body of believers over the past about 500 years or more.
What “words” am I referring to?
“God” instead of: Yahuah
“Jesus” instead of: Yahusha (Yahushua, Yahshua, Yeshua)
“Church” instead of: Ekklesia (Ecclesia)
“Jew” instead of: Judean, Judea, Judah
And the FALSE TEACHING that “Jerusalem” is the “eternal capital of Israel” is also historically INCORRECT.
Judah and Judah alone was the ONLY “Capital” of ancient Isreal. Not “Jerusalem.”
https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/a-brief-history-of-the-kingdoms-of-israel-and-judah/
You’ve already covered three of those words, the word “Church” replacing the true and rightful word that SHOULD BE in ALL ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS, the word “Ekklesia” (Ecclesia). The generic title “God” (Theos) replacing the word (the Name) of our Heavenly Father — Yahuah (Yahuwah, Yahweh) and the word (the Name) of our living risen savior Yahusha (Yahushua, Yahshua, Yeshua).
So what about the word “Jew” and the so-called “Jewish people”?
ARE THEY the ancient ancestors of the Biblical Hebrew Israelites? NO. NOT EVEN IN THE SLIGHTEST.
Is the modern nation of so-called “Israel” occupied by the same people or by ancestors of the same people who lived there BEFORE the destruction of the ancient Hebrew Israelites in AD 70 by the Roman army under Titus? NO. Not even in the slightest.
This is one of the most egregious lies in the history of the world…. that Ashkenazi European people from several Eastern European countries are somehow now a Semitic people who are going back to their ancient homeland is an absolute LIE from the PIT OF HELL.
Here is my research on this subject:
Yahusha (Yahushua, Yahshua, Yeshua)
aka: “Jesus” is NOT a “Jew”
He is a Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/jesus-was-not-a-jew/amp
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jew.htm
http://www.rense.com/general96/jesusnotjew.html
https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/are-jews-the-israelites-of-the-bible/
http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/index.php/joomla-pages/jewish-conspiracy/origin-of-the-word-the-jew
http://www.letgodbetrue.com/sermons/prophecy/70ad/sermon.php
https://www.google.com/amp/s/biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/28/the-apocalypse-of-70-ad/amp/
https://www.scribd.com/document/67508739/The-100-Year-Old-Duping-of-American-Evangelical-Christianity-Christian-Zionism#
(https://www.henrymakow.com/2015/02/christians-have-been-duped-by-zionists.html)
Here are the “honest” DNA and Historical reviews on the origins of the “Jews”:
https://phys.org/news/2018-09-ashkenazic-jews-mysterious-unravelled-scientists.html
— Ashkenazic Jews’ mysterious origins unraveled by scientists thanks to ancient DNA
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2017/08/latest-genetic-testing-jews-may-be.html —
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4339595,00.html — Debate on European Jews’ origin settled?
My dear friend… I agree with you 100% that the institutional so-called “church” is NOT a Biblical model for fellowship and is a work of men at its core. However, unlike you, I believe the Father is still working in this failed system because HE KNOWS THE DECEPTION GOING ON and HIS LOVE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE SEEKING HIM is why He still works within the broken so-called “church” system to bring those He has called and IS CALLING OUT OF IT; like me.
I am the founder and former singer, songwriter, and guitarist of the Christian rock band GUARDIAN known all over the world. I have been a follower of our Heavenly Father Yahuah and HIS GLORIOUS SON YAHUSHA (YAHUSHUA, YAHSHUA, YESHUA) for about 40 years now and have been a deep student of Holy Scripture the entire time.
The information below is only a fraction of my total research but what I do present, aligns with your teaching (to a certain extent) on the subject of the institutional church as NOT a Biblical model. I agree 100% based on the teaching of scripture and the model provided for us in the book of Acts and based on the word Ekklesia (Ecclesia) and its true meaning: Here is my research on this subject:
The word “Church” is NOT in the New Testament Non Translated writings! However, the word “Ekklesia” (also spelled: “Ecclesia”) IS in the Non-Translated NT and means something VERY MUCH DEEPER than the word “church”:
https://www.beinaberean.org/writings/church.html
http://www.aggressivechristianity.net/articles/ecclesia.htm
https://lewayotte.com/2009/11/24/words-not-found-in-scripture-church/
Modern Churches are “married to the state” thru 501-c3 tax status; this also is NOT Biblical for many reasons listed in these 2 links:
https://www.worldslastchance.com/end-time-prophecy/state-controlled-churches-the-501c3-deception.html
http://cantontruth.blogspot.com/2008/05/how-irs-controls-churches-through-501c3.html?m=1
The Church “Service” itself (how it is structured) is NOT Biblical:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/biblicisminstitute.wordpress
.com/2014/10/14/church-services-are-not-biblical/amp/
https://relearnchurch.org/4-biblical-elements-missing-from-the-modern-church-service/
http://www.inthebeginning.com/articles/church.htm
https://relevantmagazine.com/god/church/4-ways-modern-church-looks-nothing-early-church
https://www.truthaccordingtoscripture.com/documents/church-practice/house-churches.php#.W4LhRPllA0M
The name “JESUS” is a 400-year-old name (translated from the Greek means: “Hail Zeus”) and was INVENTED when the letter “J” (the last letter added to the English alphabet) was first introduced in the 17th century and included in the NT translations for the first time in the 18th century!
http://boatrvgroup.com/sabbathcovenant/christianitythegreatdeception/IesousinGreek.htm
(Note: Everything written below is from the link above… I felt it was so important I cut & paste the entire info from the link & put it below)
(Note: This is the ONLY INFORMATION from this site I use… the rest of the site I mostly disagree with… for instance the author believes there are “real Jewish people” and “counterfeit Jews” — this shows a serious misunderstanding of that entire subject. “Jews” and “Jewish people” are NOT A RACE OF PEOPLE. Period. The Askenaziam (Eastern Europeans), Sephardim & African “Jews” are all NON Semitic people and have absolutely NO CONNECTION genetically or through ancestry to the ancient Biblical Hebrews and the 12 tribes or to Abraham and his son Jacob. NONE. As in ZERO.
That said, the reason I use this info below is because it is taught by several other independent sources all saying the same thing. But this site has a much more thorough explanation.
Here is the info:
So Yahusha is English for the Hebrew name of the Messiah (anointed King of Israel) and Jesus is the name of the Greek “good man” or Chistos. It is that simple. But what does “Iesous” mean in Greek. It has no meaning in Hebrew; as it is not a Hebrew word. In Greek, “Iesous” literally translated means “Hail Zeus”. The name “Jesus” didn’t even exist until the 4th Century and was a later derivative of the late Latin Isus.
“It is known that the Greek name endings with sus, seus, and sous were attached by the Greeks to names and geographical areas as means to give honor to their supreme deity, Zeus.”
Dictionary of Christian Lore and Legend
“This name of the true Messiah, Jahshuwah (Jehoshua), being Hebrew, was objectionable to the Greeks and Romans, who hated the Judeans (Jews), and so it was deleted from the records, and a new name inserted. Jahshuwah (Jehoshua) was thus replaced by Ie-Sous (hail Zeus), now known to us as Jesus.”
-The Origin of Christianity
by A.B. Traina
“It is simply amazing to think that all these years, hundreds of years, mankind has been calling the Saviour by the wrong name!! It’s hard to give up the name of Jesus because it’s so deeply ingrained in us and much has been said and done in that name.”
-Gospel of The Kingdom
True Names and Title
Dr. Henry Clifford Kinley
1931 – Ohio USA
“In the 1611 KJ New Testament the name Yahusha appeared originally wherever the Messiah was spoken of. Yahusha means “Yahuah is Salvation”. Later the Messiah’s name was replaced with Iesus (Greek) which later in the 1600’s it became Jesus starting with the new English letter “J” which was introduced at that time. Further, the Greek “Iesus” comes from the name Zeus, the ruling God in the Greek pantheon.”
-Gospel of The Kingdom
True Names and Title
Dr. Henry Clifford Kinley
1931 – Ohio USA
We see in historical documents that the name “Jesus” did not even come into existence until the 1600’s when the letter “J” was introduced into our English language. So the name “Jesus” is only around 400 years old! The Greek “Iesus” comes from the name Zeus, the ruling God in the Greek pantheon. “Jesus” is a transliteration of a Latin name only ONE letter off “Ioesus” pronounced hey-sus – which has no meaning in Hebrew, but in Latin it means “Hail Zeus”. If Yahusha’s name had been transliterated into our language, it would have been Joshua. If the name was treated properly using the compound naming convention YHVH intended it would be YAH(weh)(ye)SHUA shortened to “Yahusha” using the short contracted form maintaining the meaning of the name and fulfilling prophecy that the Messiah “came in the NAME of YHVH”.
If the name was handled properly in Greek by the uninspired pagan scribes, it would hold true to the “meaning” of the name as given by the Angel to Joseph and Mary; then “shua” or salvation would have been translated “soterion or soter” not “sous”. So we see a gross mis-handling of the Messiah’s name at best but when you look back in history we see a Hyalinization of the name with the intent to give glory to the pagan god Zeus.
One simply would need to open up their Greek Lexicon to know the truth behind this; below is the entry from The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon:
Strong’s Number: 4992: soterion, adjective. Meaning saving, bringing salvation he who embodies this salvation, or through whom God is about to achieve it the hope of (future) salvation
The name in Latin of the Messiah therefore would have been something closer to Iesoter or Iesoterion if the intent of the meaning of the name was honored by the Greek and Roman pagan scribes and modern day translators. The name would never have been “Iesous” taking on the suffix of every other Greek name given to give glory to Zeus… “us”.
The reason behind this abomination is clearly seen. The name “Jesus” has the exact same suffix as the name of the Roman Emperor who created it: Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus. “Why” does every word in Constantine’s name end in “us”? It would only stand to reason that the all powerful Emperor would give a name to his new god in his own image with the suffix “us”. After all, Constantine believed himself to be re-incarnated Apollo (the son of Zeus). And he remade the Messiah in his own image then elevated that “image of the false messiah” in the name “Jesus” as god to be worshipped. This act of paganizing the messiah and worshipping an image of a man above YHVH is condemned by Paul in a letter to the church in Rome!
Romans 1
21 Because that, when they knew YHVH, they glorified YHVH not as God (elevating Jesus/Trinity in their hearts as God), neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened (to believe a pagan lie). 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal YHVH for images made to look like mortal man (the image of “Jesus”) and birds and animals and reptiles (signs of The Zodiac).
24 Therefore YHVH gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about YHVH for a lie (pagan Trinity), and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
When we simply take the first step and admit to ourselves the obvious, it becomes abundantly clear both “why” and “how” the name “Jesus” was easily accepted by a pagan population that worshiped Zeus, Hesus, Horus, Krishna, Julius Ceasar and the demi-god son Apollo the god of the sun. To the pagan Romans of their day, the name Iesous (Jesus Christ or JC) looked and sounded almost identical to their god-man Julius Ceasar or (JC). This is true today even in English (Julius / Jesus) even their initials remain the same an have nothing in common with Yahusha the Messiah. The English translation of Yahusha looks nothing and sounds nothing like “Jesus” it is “Joshua” or even truer still Yahusha.
The obvious truth is the Messiah’s name was changed and he was given a name like every other Greek in honor of Zeus. No wonder Yahusha condemns those who “in his name” did all that amazing stuff using the name “Jesus” teaching The Law has been abolished. They never knew him. They literally fell for the false religion of pagan Rome.
OTHER SOURCES Saying the same or something very similar — that the name “Jesus” is NOT OUR SAVIOR’S Real name:
https://www.worldslastchance.com/why-yahuwah-a-yahushua-only.html
http://www.hiddenbible.com/jesuszeus/jesuszeus.html
http://www.eliyah.com/nameson.htm
Early Believers for the first 400-500 years COMPLETELY AGREED AGAINST WAR, KILLING and VIOLENCE of ANY KIND! Period. They DID NOT support being in the military at all! If you were in it BEFORE becoming a believer you HAD TO LEAVE IT in order to be a part of their fellowships!
https://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2016/janfeb/early-church-on-war-and-killing.html?paging=off
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2013/07/08/the-early-church-and-military-service/
http://themelios.thegospelcoalition.org/article/nonviolence-in-the-ancient-church-and-christian-obedience
http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/socgospel.htm
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/christiancrier/2018/05/30/how-did-the-early-church-differ-from-the-church-today/
I’ve included articles on the early believers’ views on the military and war as well because the so-called “church” (especially the evangelical “churches”) think being in the military is honorable and a “Christian duty” when in reality it’s the exact opposite.
But there are more issues to consider under the same pretext. That pretext being the fact that the English translations of the New Testament have had several WORD CHANGES or a better way to say is… there has been some “tinkering” with just a few select words and these words have caused GREAT CONFUSION and GREAT DECEPTION within the body of believers over the past about 500 years or more.
What “words” am I referring to?
“God” instead of: Yahuah
“Jesus” instead of: Yahusha (Yahushua, Yahshua, Yeshua)
“Church” instead of: Ekklesia (Ecclesia)
“Jew” instead of: Judean, Judea, Judah
And the FALSE TEACHING that “Jerusalem” is the “eternal capital of Israel” is also historically INCORRECT.
Judah and Judah alone was the ONLY “Capital” of ancient Isreal. Not “Jerusalem.”
https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/a-brief-history-of-the-kingdoms-of-israel-and-judah/
You’ve already covered three of those words, the word “Church” replacing the true and rightful word that SHOULD BE in ALL ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS, the word “Ekklesia” (Ecclesia). The generic title “God” (Theos) replacing the word (the Name) of our Heavenly Father — Yahuah (Yahuwah, Yahweh) and the word (the Name) of our living risen savior Yahusha (Yahushua, Yahshua, Yeshua).
So what about the word “Jew” and the so-called “Jewish people”?
ARE THEY the ancient ancestors of the Biblical Hebrew Israelites? NO. NOT EVEN IN THE SLIGHTEST.
Is the modern nation of so-called “Israel” occupied by the same people or by ancestors of the same people who lived there BEFORE the destruction of the ancient Hebrew Israelites in AD 70 by the Roman army under Titus? NO. Not even in the slightest.
This is one of the most egregious lies in the history of the world…. that Ashkenazi European people from several Eastern European countries are somehow now a Semitic people who are going back to their ancient homeland is an absolute LIE from the PIT OF HELL.
Here is my research on this subject:
Yahusha (Yahushua, Yahshua, Yeshua)
aka: “Jesus” is NOT a “Jew”
He is a Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/jesus-was-not-a-jew/amp
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jew.htm
http://www.rense.com/general96/jesusnotjew.html
https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/are-jews-the-israelites-of-the-bible/
http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/index.php/joomla-pages/jewish-conspiracy/origin-of-the-word-the-jew
http://www.letgodbetrue.com/sermons/prophecy/70ad/sermon.php
https://www.google.com/amp/s/biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/28/the-apocalypse-of-70-ad/amp/
https://www.scribd.com/document/67508739/The-100-Year-Old-Duping-of-American-Evangelical-Christianity-Christian-Zionism#
(https://www.henrymakow.com/2015/02/christians-have-been-duped-by-zionists.html)
Here are the “honest” DNA and Historical reviews on the origins of the “Jews”:
https://phys.org/news/2018-09-ashkenazic-jews-mysterious-unravelled-scientists.html
— Ashkenazic Jews’ mysterious origins unraveled by scientists thanks to ancient DNA
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2017/08/latest-genetic-testing-jews-may-be.html —
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4339595,00.html — Debate on European Jews’ origin settled?